SBLC / BG ISSUANCE

Bank first. Payment route second. Final issuance last.

No-upfront issuance may be considered only within a fully qualified, documented and contractually secured transaction.

MANDATORY GATES

Four conditions before final issuance.

01

Identified Receiving Bank

Legal name, country, branch/address, BIC/SWIFT and identifiable bank officer.

02

Official Bank Confirmation

Transaction-specific evidence of technical capability, prerequisites and intended post-receipt treatment where applicable.

03

Verified Payment Route

ISS-PAY-A or ISS-PAY-B must be identified, documented and independently verifiable before final issuance.

04

Complete Dossier

Corporate/KYC, beneficiary, amount, economic purpose, supporting transaction evidence and compliance readiness.

NO IDENTIFIED RECEIVING BANK + NO BANK EVIDENCE + NO VERIFIED PAYMENT ROUTE + NO COMPLETE DOSSIER = NO FINAL ISSUANCE QUALIFICATION.
CONTROLLED RECEIVING BANK PACKAGE

For the No-Upfront pathway, the Receiving Bank qualification must be evidenced before final issuance review. Use the controlled requirements and executive flow below.

POST-MT760 PAYMENT ROUTE

No-upfront is a timing facility — not an absence of payment obligation.

MT760
Receiving Bank
Authentication
Payment Route Gate
ISS-PAY-A

Financing / Monetization Route

Receiving Bank or identified financing institution → financing / credit / monetization assessment → available proceeds → contractual Applicant / Provider Purchase Price settlement.

  • Institution identified before final issuance.
  • Financing basis / potential LTV assessed where legitimately available.
  • Conditions precedent and verification route documented.
  • No funding is presumed until institution approval.
ISS-PAY-B

Independent Funds Route

Receiving Bank authenticates the instrument → independently verified funding source → contractual Applicant / Provider Purchase Price settlement.

  • Funding source identified and independently verified.
  • Amount, currency and availability evidenced.
  • Contractual payment trigger documented.
  • Receiving Bank remains part of the authentication / operational route.
Beneficiary statements alone are not sufficient evidence of the settlement route. Any bank payment undertaking, assignment, escrow, payment instruction or similar mechanism must be legally valid and expressly accepted by the relevant institution.
PURCHASE STRUCTURE — INDICATIVE ONLY

Illustrative economics must remain subordinate to institutional verification.

Applicant / Provider Purchase Price

Where the structure is a purchase, an indicative commercial assumption of approximately 40%–45% of face value may be discussed depending on issuing-bank quality, instrument terms, transaction profile, negotiated conditions and compliance.

NOT A BANK RATE OR PUBLIC OFFER

Proposed Issuing Bank Profile

Top-tier / first-class international bank, subject to transaction-specific acceptability by the Receiving Bank and other relevant institutions.

Illustrative, non-exhaustive examples: HSBC, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Barclays and other banks of comparable institutional standing. No bank is deemed accepted before transaction-specific confirmation.

WHEN ADSGI ALSO HANDLES MONETIZATION

The monetization route becomes a pre-issuance gate.

If the same mandate includes monetization, final issuance should not be requested until the prospective monetization institution, bank/instrument eligibility, expected structure and payment protection have been sufficiently qualified.